What Dutch buyers are actually deciding
Dutch commercial teams tend to evaluate software briskly and dislike being managed through a sales process. The decision here is usually not which platform has the broadest feature set. It is whether a tool can be understood, priced and tested without three meetings, and whether the vendor will give a direct answer to a direct question about limitations.
That preference is worth taking seriously as a buying method, not just a national stereotype. A vendor who publishes a price, admits what the product does not do, and lets you run a real deal through a free plan is giving you a cheaper and more accurate evaluation than any structured demonstration would.
Language is less of an obstacle here, and still worth testing
English-language business software is ordinary in the Netherlands, which removes an obstacle that would be decisive elsewhere. It does not remove it entirely. Test the product on the colleague least comfortable working in English, because they are the adoption risk, and adoption is what decides whether the purchase was worth anything.
The real problem is usually distribution of knowledge
In most small Dutch companies the customer relationship is genuinely held by one account manager, along with the pricing history, the informal commitments and the messaging thread. The company only discovers the cost of that arrangement during a holiday, an illness or a resignation, which is precisely the wrong moment.
