What agency buyers are actually deciding
An agency choosing a CRM is really deciding how much process its senior people will tolerate. That is an unusual constraint. In most businesses the people entering data can be managed into doing it; in an agency the people holding the relationships are client-facing directors whose time is expensive and whose cooperation is voluntary in practice, whatever the organisation chart says.
Design for that and the choice becomes clear. You want the smallest structure that produces a trustworthy pipeline number and a set of dated commitments. Everything beyond that is a tax paid in goodwill, and agencies do not have much goodwill to spend on internal systems.
The pipeline is only worth what it is trusted to be
An agency pipeline containing every conversation anyone has ever had is worse than a short one containing only live opportunities with dates. The first produces a number nobody believes, which means the Monday meeting reverts to anecdote and the CRM becomes decorative within a month.
Expansion is the pipeline nobody owns
Most agency growth comes from existing clients, and almost no agency assigns that work to anyone specific. It is warm, it is faster to close, and it is invisible because it does not arrive as an enquiry. Giving it its own board with owners is one of the cheapest improvements available.
