The case against the annual training day
Annual training days are scheduled because they are administratively convenient. They gather everyone, they justify a budget line, and they feel substantial. The problem is that skill acquisition responds to spacing and application, not to intensity. A full day covers eight topics and the team returns to a backlog, applies none of them within the window where the memory is warm, and by the following month the day exists mainly as a photograph.
The counter-argument is fair: a monthly rhythm needs someone to prepare twelve times a year, and preparation is where good intentions die. That is a real cost and it is why the format below is deliberately small. Forty-five minutes with a fixed shape can be prepared in under an hour by someone who knows the topic.