How cleaning contracts are actually won in Egypt
Buildings are managed, so the buyer is an administrator
Most contract cleaning here is bought by a building or compound administrator, a company administration manager, a hotel operations team or a hospital services department. None of them own the building, and all of them answer to somebody about cost. That shapes the proposal you should be writing. A deployment explained clearly, with headcount, shifts and relief cover set out, is far easier for an administrator to defend to a committee than a lower number with no working behind it.
It also means the relationship sits with a role. Administrators change, and a cleaning company whose entire history with a compound lives in one supervisor phone loses years of context when that person moves on. Keeping the survey, the pricing assumptions, the complaint record and the renewal history against the client account is straightforward protection against that.
Costs move during the contract, and contracts do not
The specific commercial pressure in this market is that wages, transport and consumable prices change inside a contract year while the agreed monthly rate does not. A company that treats the rate as fixed until the client raises it will slowly stop making money on its oldest and most stable accounts, which are exactly the accounts it would least like to lose.
The fix is not aggressive pricing. It is a record. When the rate history, the deployment assumptions and the date of the last revision are all attached to the contract, a mid term conversation about cost becomes evidence based rather than awkward, and it happens at the right time instead of after the loss has been absorbed for six months.