The four methods, honestly compared
| Method | Best for | Where it hurts |
|---|---|---|
| CSV import | Modest volumes, clean structure | Manual cleaning and no history |
| Native importer | Common source systems | Mapping choices you cannot override |
| Migration service | Large volumes or awkward history | Cost, and decisions still yours |
| Custom script | Unusual structures, repeat loads | Needs a developer and testing time |
Notice that none of the four removes the mapping decisions. A service can move data faster than you can, but somebody at your end still has to say what a record in the old system means in the new one. Teams that expect to outsource that decision are the ones that end up unhappy with the result.